Don’t mix business with religious beliefs

I am responding to Richard Elfers’ opinion column regarding whether or not people should be allowed to disobey the law based on their own religious beliefs.

I am responding to Richard Elfers’ opinion column (Courier-Herald, March 1) regarding whether or not people should be allowed to disobey the law based on their own religious beliefs, “State courts should protect business owners.”

In defense of his position that businesses should be allowed to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation, he cites the First Amendment portion which states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof.” Somehow, he interprets this to mean that a business can disobey the law based on the owner’s personal religious beliefs. He claims that doing so would do no “financial harm” and is therefore justified.

Where does he draw the line, exactly? If there is no other business that offers the same service within 10 miles is it no longer OK? Fifty miles? A hundred miles? And what services can be denied? Flowers? Funeral services? Auto painting? Rental of an apartment? Hospital services? Surgeries? All services? And since when did laws that apply to business cross the line and affect anybody’s personal right to what ever religious beliefs they wish to practice? Kim Davis decided to break state laws and deny marriage certificates because of her beliefs and that is alright also?

So perhaps what he is really saying is that sexual orientation should not be protected at all, that gays should be kicked out of their homes and jobs and denied all services in hopes that they will all just starve to death and go away? Laws are made to protect people because of beliefs such as the ones that Mr. Elfers is trying to defend – the belief that your own personal beliefs make it alright to discriminate against somebody else. He fails to draw the line as to where his supposedly protected religious bias can end.

There is a reason the constitution draws a line between church and state, and businesses are not nonprofit, nontaxed, religious organizations.

Brenda Perron-Horner

Enumclaw

More in Letters to the Editor

Urge Enumclaw Council to support arts funding

There will be public budget workshops to make your comments at on Oct. 22 and 29.

Democrats’ political power play hurt us all

From day one and without waiting to hear any evidence, the Democrats stated that Christine Blasey Ford was telling the truth and her accusations against Judge Kavanaugh were credible.

It’s a jungle out there

Justice Kavanaugh’s hearing before his confirmation was suited more for the zoo than Congress.

Support for arts should not be eliminated from Enumclaw’s budget

Art is my life - both visual arts and other genres.

Democrat PAC spreading false statements on Rossi

It’s simply not true that Dino Rossi was responsible for denying health care coverage for tens of thousands of kids.

Double standard? Maybe, but Democrats started it.

The political double standard is being played out today with the Judge Kavanaugh hearings.

I was assaulted by a ‘good man,’ and my community didn’t believe me

How do I process and file away the goodness I saw and experienced before the incident? Do we throw out the baby with the bathwater?

Wally, don’t contribute to gun misinformation

You should have seen a gun expert before writing your column.

Thank you for, Mount Peak Historical Fire Lookout Association supporters

Keep a lookout for future information during this fundraising phase.

Freedom of religions doesn’t mean imposing your beliefs on the public

To then allow any person or group to inflict its particular religious beliefs upon others would clearly deny our right to freely worship and follow our own beliefs

Businesses should serve the public equally

Many a war has started over “deeply held beliefs’ and religious convictions.

Editor failed to be a fair moderator

Instead of framing the issues and allowing the readers to “form their own opinions on the matters at hand,” the editor chose to apply superfluous labels.