Editor failed to be a fair moderator

Instead of framing the issues and allowing the readers to “form their own opinions on the matters at hand,” the editor chose to apply superfluous labels.

I appreciate that the Courier-Herald endeavored to spur thoughtful debate on the tension between the protections afforded Americans under the 1st and 14th Amendments to the Constitution. Thoughtful consideration of the balance between the two is vital to protect the liberties that we enjoy.

However, I was dismayed that Mr. Miller-Still promptly undermined his attempt to fairly moderate the debate. Instead of framing the issues and allowing the readers to “form their own opinions on the matters at hand,” the editor chose to apply superfluous labels to Ms. Stutzman’s legal counsel. He admonishes the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) as a “hate group”. This designation is applied by the Southern Poverty Law Center – an organization to which the reader is implicitly expected to abrogate their own critical faculties. Perhaps the ADF has a track record of blatant discrimination; however, Mr. Miller-Still never tells his readers what the firm has done to earn this moniker, yet they are expected to trust that it is warranted. Furthermore, the ADF is “right-wing” and “extreme”, two rather imprecise phrases that are subject to wide interpretation, but are used in this context to sow skepticism. Regardless, the labels present a smokescreen and are irrelevant to the issues. Alas, no broad characterizations are presented to describe the state’s assumedly measured intentions.

I agree with Mr. Miller-Still that “extreme bias should be met with extreme scrutiny”. I suppose we must look elsewhere for a moderator to lead a measured debate.

Chris Gruner

Enumclaw

More in Letters to the Editor

We must move away from identity politics

Mr. Trump recognized the legitimate concerns of the “working class” and socio-economic middle class which have born a disproportionate negative impact from many of Washington’s policies.

Thank you, first responders and community members

A special thanks to the people we know and the people we have never met that fought off the fire, protecting our home as if it was their own.

Deeply held religious beliefs do good in the world

It is truly disheartening to see the eagerness with which people jump on the bandwagon to Christian bash.

SPLC accurately labels hate organizations and people

The SPLC has received my support for many years and will continue to receive my support for their efforts to defend the civil rights of all persons.

Thank you for, Mount Peak Historical Fire Lookout Association supporters

Keep a lookout for future information during this fundraising phase.

Freedom of religions doesn’t mean imposing your beliefs on the public

To then allow any person or group to inflict its particular religious beliefs upon others would clearly deny our right to freely worship and follow our own beliefs

Businesses should serve the public equally

Many a war has started over “deeply held beliefs’ and religious convictions.

Editor failed to be a fair moderator

Instead of framing the issues and allowing the readers to “form their own opinions on the matters at hand,” the editor chose to apply superfluous labels.

“Deeply held beliefs” no excuse for discrimination

Is it not time that we recognize that “deeply held beliefs,” sometimes are simply wrong?

Southern Poverty Law Center no longer credible

The editor’s use of the SPLC in an opinion piece was flawed.

All encouraged to participate in this year’s National Night Out

This is a chance for neighbors to build neighborhood spirit.

Lindquist made our communities safer

He has a proven record of protecting seniors, locking up career criminals, and suing Big Pharma to recover money for taxpayers.