Lack of respect, not guns, is the problem

All the laws that are on the books now and still criminals have firearms.

Editor’s note: This is a response to a Feb. 28 letter, “We must move forward on responsible gun rights.”

As a responsible firearms owner, I take exception to April Hurst’s letter saying, “An overwhelming majority of all Americans want a ban on military assault weapons, and so do a majority of responsible gun owners.”

You’re saying I’m irresponsible in owning a muzzle loading rifle, you do not understand the advancement of firearms history because of military influences. The muzzle loader an improvement over the bow and arrow, the single shot rifle an improvement over a muzzle loader, a lever action an improvement over a single shot, a bolt action an improvement over lever action, a semi auto an improvement over bolt action.

All hunting and sporting rifles over the years have their roots from military firearms. You want what has been improved in firearms over centuries banned because those designs were incorporated into our sporting and hunting firearms from military firearms. This doesn’t make them an assault rifle.

Addressing your terminology, you’re using the English translation of the German word Sturmgewehr, translation – assault rifle. It’s a selective-fire firearm that can be used as full auto or single shot auto rifle. Only semi-auto firearms can be sold in USA. June 26, 1934 the Congress passed a tax on full auto/assault rifles which requires background checks, then apply for a tax stamp. Having a full auto/assault rifle without the proper paperwork, is a crime. NO semi-automatic rifle is an assault rifle. You just want to ban all legal semi-autos, by branding them as an assault rifle because that definition fits your agenda.

Your figures, “98 percent of people also want much stronger background checks in all weapon purchases.” I’m a Range Safety Office and Firearms Instructor I know for a fact from contact with legal firearm owners your figure is grossly exaggerated.

Knifes, baseball bats, cars, trucks, air planes (the twin towers) or whatever. All used in violent assaults.

Laws are already on the books, but not followed or enforced. The FBI and Sheriff’s departments were called in Florida, they did nothing about Cruz.

I grew up when there was respect for laws. We took our firearms to school, to go hunting after school. In pickups and cars, in gun racks in the windows, no problem. We respected the laws, sure we did a little drag racing, when caught paid the ticket.

Take Chicago, with the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. 400 killings as of February 26, 2018. Just got that information from a CPD LT. It’s the murder capital of the nation, followed by Washington DC, with same restive gun laws. Truth is criminals are using illegal firearms to commit crimes/kill. You want to disarm, we the lawful citizens, making us a target rich environment for criminals. All the laws that are on the books now and still criminals have firearms. Increase the punishment times five for crimes committed with a firearm with no plea deal. Hard time for “armed crime!”

Robert Meneghini


More in Letters to the Editor

We must move away from identity politics

Mr. Trump recognized the legitimate concerns of the “working class” and socio-economic middle class which have born a disproportionate negative impact from many of Washington’s policies.

Thank you, first responders and community members

A special thanks to the people we know and the people we have never met that fought off the fire, protecting our home as if it was their own.

Deeply held religious beliefs do good in the world

It is truly disheartening to see the eagerness with which people jump on the bandwagon to Christian bash.

SPLC accurately labels hate organizations and people

The SPLC has received my support for many years and will continue to receive my support for their efforts to defend the civil rights of all persons.

Thank you for, Mount Peak Historical Fire Lookout Association supporters

Keep a lookout for future information during this fundraising phase.

Freedom of religions doesn’t mean imposing your beliefs on the public

To then allow any person or group to inflict its particular religious beliefs upon others would clearly deny our right to freely worship and follow our own beliefs

Businesses should serve the public equally

Many a war has started over “deeply held beliefs’ and religious convictions.

Editor failed to be a fair moderator

Instead of framing the issues and allowing the readers to “form their own opinions on the matters at hand,” the editor chose to apply superfluous labels.

“Deeply held beliefs” no excuse for discrimination

Is it not time that we recognize that “deeply held beliefs,” sometimes are simply wrong?

Southern Poverty Law Center no longer credible

The editor’s use of the SPLC in an opinion piece was flawed.

All encouraged to participate in this year’s National Night Out

This is a chance for neighbors to build neighborhood spirit.

Lindquist made our communities safer

He has a proven record of protecting seniors, locking up career criminals, and suing Big Pharma to recover money for taxpayers.