Liberals embrace the Constitution only when it supports their agenda | Letter

Two obviously liberal letters printed last week in The Courier-Herald excoriated a previous writer’s views as being harsh and advocating unconstitutional treatment of Bowe Bergdahl, the recently-released captured soldier.

Two obviously liberal letters printed last week in The Courier-Herald excoriated a previous writer’s views as being harsh and advocating unconstitutional treatment of Bowe Bergdahl, the recently-released captured soldier. As stated by Shakespeare “… (they) doth protest too much, methinks.” Their admonishments might bear more weight if they had not been so blatantly hypocritical when considering the liberals’ stands on the U.S. Constitution; perhaps some introspection is due.

First, the writers’ concerns about the “Mr. Patriot(‘s)” inflammatory word choices amuses one. Their voices went AWOL when Sen. Harry Reid referred to the Tea Party as “domestic terrorists.” Or when one of their “bellowing talking heads…ranting demagoguery…” on MSNBC – Chris Matthews – called the Tea Party “Nazis” and “storm troopers.” Were the writers outraged? Was this “hot talk” from the senator and liberal media “…foment(ing) anger and hate,” or is it OK only when it fits the so-called progressive agenda? Also, Bergdahl’s squad members suffered the progressive press ad hominem attacks because they expressed their first-hand experience of the deserter’s letter and desire to leave his post. Since the factual reports didn’t support the liberal template, these soldiers’ statements were so much grist for the liberal media mill accusing of them “swift boating” Bergdahl.

Secondly, does the First Amendment only extend to speech that agrees with me and must all other be regulated or dismissed? Ironically, the liberals drape themselves in the Constitution only when it mirrors their needs. The president referred to the Constitution as a “…230 years old document that needed updating…” Why, because it thwarts his socialist goals? He further bemoaned the electoral college because it didn’t give the heavily populated states more say in elections. The founding fathers meant it that way to give the little guy states equality; hey, the first affirmative action. Hardly a day passes that the president or like-minded people don’t whine about FOX News – basically the only conservative media left, but it is too much for them.

The ink barely dried on the Obamacare law document when the president began redacting it to fit his political needs. As the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, he doesn’t have constitutional right to change enacted statutes. Sadly, a weak Congress (13 percent approval rating) stood by and watched. Last week the Supreme Court found that some of the Obama recess appointments violated the Constitution. Yes, the liberal progressives love the Constitution when it fits their needs but not so much if it stifles them. Yet, as Hillary Clinton said, “What difference does it make?” – hopefully the next elections will provide the difference.

Let the rights ordained by the Constitution be ever available to all and the people ever vigilant in protecting said rights. Work for term limits and contact your federal/state legislators.

George Terhaar

Enumclaw

More in Letters to the Editor

Anthem protests about equality, not disrespect

For all who write negative comments about the football players who took a knee and posted that “this is not the America we grew up in,” let me share a few of the personal events from my life growing up in Tacoma Washington as a white woman.

Former fan finished with disrespectful NFL players

I lived off the grid for 15 years and the one thing I missed the most was watching pro football.

Children of illegal immigrants should stay

You are not “making America great again.” You are just making it more intolerant to diversity.

More information needed on proposed recycling site

We want to bring awareness to your readers about a 34 acre wood recycling center that is in the permitting process with King County.

Congratulations, Jan Molinaro

In every election, one person must win and the other will lose. Now more than ever, it is important to show our children how to be gracious in victory and humble in defeat.

Enumclaw mayor deserves a thanks for a job well done

I have always been proud to say I live in Enumclaw.

Clarification on Expo Center funding vote

As a citizen that values our local paper and likes to stay informed about the upcoming elections, I have enjoyed reading the Courier Herald debate for the Enumclaw Mayoreal election.

Molinaro an excellent candidate for Mayor

Following my two interviews with candidate Malinaro, I feel that we are fortunate to have a candidate who is well prepared to provide the leadership we need for a growing community.

The definition of insanity

It is totally clear that the incumbent mayor lacks any ability to bring people together and get things done. She is a failure as mayor, making Black Diamond a laughing stock with her out of control behavior and outbursts at Council meetings.

Baxley and Young should have showed up at public forum

On Tuesday, October 17th, was the Black Diamond Maple Valley Chamber of Commerce Candidates Forum, where the Black Diamond candidates for Mayor and two City Council positions had the opportunity to talk with the citizens of Black Diamond, and to answer questions put to them by these citizens.

Enumclaw helped raise $3,500 for Special Olympics

The last couple of weekends the St. Barbara Knights of Columbus have been involved with our annual Tootsie Roll Program.

Baxley is an important choice for Black Diamond mayor

Judy Baxley has been part of our local civics for years, and thank goodness because citizen involvement is critical to monitoring big developers.