BRUNELL: Special interests prevent budget cuts

In good times, our elected leaders can walk the high wire between spending and taxes, spreading money around like gobs of peanut butter on a slice of toast.

In good times, our elected leaders can walk the high wire between spending and taxes, spreading money around like gobs of peanut butter on a slice of toast. Bringing home the bacon has always been a sure ticket to re-election.

But when the economy goes sour and money is short, all kinds of special interests descend on politicians hollering, “Cut somebody else, not me!”

Who are those special interests? We all have them, whether it’s a church group lobbying for nonprofit tax exemptions, an environmental organization seeking more public funds to clean up Puget Sound, a union buttonholing politicians for collective bargaining rights or a business group asking officials to hold down taxes so employers can create jobs.

In Olympia, Gov. Chris Gregoire and Democrat lawmakers are $2.6 billion short of the money they need to pay for the programs they authorized last spring in the 2009-11 state budget. They need to cut spending, but special interests are massed inside the state capitol fighting for their sacred cows.

Some are urging that, rather than cut programs, lawmakers should raise taxes.

But lawmakers are justifiably squeamish about raising taxes. They hiked taxes back in 1993, and the following year, angry voters tossed so many Democrats out of office that Republicans took control of the House and came within one vote of capturing the Senate. The reverse happened in the 1980s when Republicans temporarily extended the sales tax to food in order to balance the budget. Even President George H.W. Bush was evicted from the White House for violating his 1988 campaign pledge, “Read my lips: no new taxes!”

So lawmakers across the country are in a bind. Voters want government to spend less and not raise their taxes, but if politicians don’t bring home the bacon, they could be cast out next November.

People say they want smaller government, but they are quick to scream bloody murder if their program is targeted.

That attitude isn’t Democrat or Republican; it’s the nature of politics. For example, last year some lawmakers balked at the prospect of closing driver licensing offices in their districts even though more and more people are renewing licenses online. It was their sacred cow.

It’s like Louisiana’s late U.S. Senator Russell B. Long used to say, “Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that man behind the tree.” Well, that won’t work today; there are not enough trees to hide behind.

So what should the governor and lawmakers do?

First, it was clear from the elections in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts that people want those they elect from both parties to focus on jobs. People want efficient government and they want to be heard. They don’t care who gets the credit, they want Republicans and Democrats to work together to find solutions.

Second, people want Congress to stop using their tax money for backroom deals. When Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson secured $100 million in federal money for his state in exchange for his vote on health care reform, it was the tipping point for the American people.

Third, people need to wean themselves from government funding. Realize that there is not enough tax money for the government to provide every conceivable service or program. We have to start doing things for ourselves and helping our neighbors in need.

It is possible. People are willing to step up when their backs are to the wall.

Gov. Gregoire was right to call for innovation. Government needs to find new and better ways of delivering the services people require and maybe government itself should contract some of those services to the private sector.

If our economy is to recover, voters, the private sector and government leaders must give up their sacred cows and do things differently, better and at lower costs.

Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business.

More in Opinion

America is denying three hard truths

There are three major hard truths that our current government has been denying with great vigor: The Mueller Russia-U.S. Presidential election connection investigation, the war in Afghanistan, and the growing national deficit.

Promote the common good by ensuring individual liberty

Citizens following their passions and dreams improve the lot for all.

The three personas of President Trump

There’s Teleprompter Trump, Raw Meat Trump and Twitter Trump.

Carbon pricing won’t help environment, but will hurt taxpayers

How would a Washington carbon tax make a difference in the world “climate?”

It’s never enough

Based on numbers from the legislature, Enumclaw School District will be receiving huge funding increases from the state. Yet here we are with Enumclaw and a bunch of other districts telling the taxpayers, give us more, we need more.

Why are trailers allowed at Expo Center?

When my husband and I moved to our home in 2001 and for every year after the Expo Center grounds have always been pleasant to look at on your way to our home. No longer is this true.

Columnist sheds light on Koch brothers

Our economy, along with our political system, is broken and indeed destroying our democracy.

Vote ‘yes’ on replacement Education Programs levy

As a high school senior that has spent the entirety of my school life in Enumclaw, I know we have to take it upon ourselves to ensure the efficiency and inclusiveness of our school system.

Concern for common good is buried by greed

Tell big lies long and loudly enough and people will believe you.

Enumclaw boys, join the scouts

Troop 422 here in Enumclaw has taught me these things, and it has allowed me to be able to incorporate these things into my own life.

Concessions may be needed to enact carbon pricing

This is the sixth year Gov. Jay Inslee will try to convince lawmakers that the best means of fighting climate change is by making it more expensive to pollute.

Humility allows for tolerance of other’s opinions

Each of us has grown up in different circumstances. Each has been shaped by our life experiences. Each of us sees the world around us differently as a result. Why, then, should it be so difficult to understand that no two people will agree on every issue?