McCleary decision put state lawmakers on notice | Richard Elfers’ Politics in Focus

The McCleary versus the state of Washington decision of Jan. 5, 2012, set the stage. According to the state constitution, “It is the paramount duty of the State to make ample provision for the education of all students residing within its borders.”

The McCleary versus the state of Washington decision of Jan. 5, 2012, set the stage. According to the state constitution, “It is the paramount duty of the State to make ample provision for the education of all students residing within its borders.”

What will the state Legislature do? Will it obey the state Supreme Court’s decision to follow the state constitution’s declaration to support and uphold K-12 education as the paramount duty of Washington’s legislature, or will lawmakers avoid following that prioritization from the McCleary decision?

Enumclaw School District Superintendent Mike Nelson was clearly pleased by the court’s decision to enforce compliance to the constitution in his State of Education address recently. All school districts in the state echo his views. Doing so means the state will have to increase educational funding by at least $1 billion for the 2013-15 biennium.

The court unanimously declared that the state’s paramount duty means “first and highest priority, before any other state programs or operations.” Finally, someone has forced the lawmakers to set priorities.

The state Legislature has allowed politics to get in the way of obeying the law. Not putting education as the paramount duty of the state has set a very bad example for Washingtonians. If the Legislature won’t keep the law, why should the citizens obey it? The state must change its ways.

As we have heard so often, no one is above the law, especially the state’s senators and representatives. If the Legislature wants to change the intent of the constitution, then they should move toward passing constitutional change. Since that option is not politically viable, the only solution in this legislative session is to make funding education the No. 1 priority. Other programs must either be cut and/or taxes raised to pay for them. State government must become accountable.

The reason this decision is so difficult to obey is that we citizens will also have to face reality. Constituents want more services without paying the cost of those increased services. This issue can no longer be kicked down the road for future lawmakers to decide on. Legislators must do what they have been elected and sworn to do: obey the constitution. They have a difficult task: figuring out how to fulfill this obligation and please their constituents at the same time.

Obeying the McCleary decision will force the Legislature to put other priorities in secondary positions. Cities in Washington desperately need help in funding repair of the infrastructure: roads and bridges, sewers, and water. They’re in poor condition, and the longer we wait to fix them the more it will cost the taxpayers. Student costs for college have also soared. The McCleary decision does not cover these costs, yet the future generation of workers needs to be educated. Other priorities, such as dealing with costs of our criminal system, and with our social services must somehow be addressed with the reshifting of resources brought on by McCleary.

The only solution to this funding crisis is for Republicans and Democrats to work together for the good of the state. Any unwillingness to compromise will mean gridlock and stagnation. The time has come for the state Legislature to step up and act courageously. The McCleary decision could actually break the deadlock of partisanship in the government.

As a former K-12 teacher, I believe that fully funding education is a long-term solution not only for public schools, but also for other important priorities. It’s going to force us all to make decisions about the role of government. Perhaps that clearer focus will cause us to work together in the other areas of need in this state.

The constitution says it is “The paramount duty of the State to make ample provision for the education of all students residing within its borders.” The only solution is for our lawmakers to follow the direction of the state Supreme Court. My advice to our legislators: “Do the right thing.”

More in Opinion

Living life deliberately | SoHaPP

Bonney Lake resident Sue Z. Hart will be doing some laughter therapy Dec. 8th at 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. at the Enumclaw library.

The future simply borrows from the past

People can examine the same point in history and come up with completely different interpretations.

Rambling through the scriptures

I’m spiritual, not religious, but I try to read the Bible anyway.

Time running out for Bonney Lake history?

As a volunteer non-profit, it’s hard to keep the ball rolling.

State revenue is unprecedented, but it’s still not enough

Bargaining agreements, mental health services, homelessness programs and the fight against opioid addiction take a lot of money to fund.

Congrats, Superintendent Nelson

You and the Enumclaw School District Board of Directors deserve the honors you received.

Bring orchestra back to the Sumner School District

Music can help kids achieve more.

Thank you for everyone’s support

The community rallied around us when Jim Van Wieringen passed.

Phones in school are a big problem

As a student, I see how phones can distract others and limit how I can learn from my peers.

Trump helped erase voter complacency

Our president raises his base and enflames his opposition at the same time.

Midterm winners and losers

Those who came out ahead include Big Oil and Big Soda.

People of all politics remove signs

I’d like to respond to the letter (“Don’t steal or block political… Continue reading