Something special is missing from comedy

During the past 40 or 50 years, American humor has gotten increasingly crude and base. I don’t think this is necessarily bad. In fact, just the reverse; in many instances it’s beneficial. That being the case, I’m certainly not recommending any kind of censorship. Not by any stretch. Yet, some aspects of this trend are a bit disheartening.

  • Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:43am
  • Opinion

Wally’s World

During the past 40 or 50 years, American humor has gotten increasingly crude and base. I don’t think this is necessarily bad. In fact, just the reverse; in many instances it’s beneficial. That being the case, I’m certainly not recommending any kind of censorship. Not by any stretch. Yet, some aspects of this trend are a bit disheartening.

Just for the record, the use of mild expletives and a “risky” story or two can be traced all the way back to seedy Vaudeville in the 1920s. During World War II, Bob Hope and George Burns pushed the envelope a bit on USO tours with the troops and, in the 1950s, Red Foxx made a few “adults only” 33 records that used the lord’s name in vain.

But things didn’t really get loose until the “raunch” humor of Lenny Bruce came along in the late ‘50s. He was the original “F-word” comedian, but today few people remember or know anything about him. Bruce was the inspiration for modern comedians like Richard Pryor and George Carlin who, in turn, inspired hundreds of today’s humorists on HBO, Comedy Central and independent channels like MTV.

Several of the new comedians are genuinely funny, but too many others haven’t yet developed a really humorous routine and, consequently, resort to 12-letter words because such language never fails to invoke considerable laughter – or at least a nervous, feeble chuckle. In particular, their racy jokes and sexual innuendoes are generously splattered with crude, street vernacular.

And speaking of racy jokes and innuendoes, these have become the main staple of nearly all modern sitcoms. It’s only a slight exaggeration to say every other line on “Two and a Half Men” has a not-too-subtle sexual connotation. Late night comedians like David Letterman also lace their monologues with mild swear words and frequent sexual quips.

Here again, I wish to point out that I’m not insulted by modern sitcoms and I certainly wouldn’t promote any censorship. Indeed, I thoroughly enjoy “Two and a Half Men” and watch Letterman on a regular basis.

However, it’s a little disheartening that modern comedy has to constantly resort to such base levels to get a laugh. As mentioned at the outset, this hasn’t always been the case. For example, movie star Charlie Chaplin was one of the finest, most gifted comedians of the 20th century and he didn’t tell a single sordid story or utter a single curse word. Indeed, his best films were made prior to the advent of motion picture sound, so all his positively brilliant humor relied entirely on body mannerisms and facial expressions.

After Chaplin and sound, there were a number of other wonderful comedians. Instead of profanity and sexy innuendoes, Laurel and Hardy relied on physical humor and pratfalls – silly comedy that revolved around moving a piano or fixing the plumbing. Abbott and Costello offered funny little skits, like their famous “who’s on first?” routine. W.C. Fields’ whole career could be characterized as one long war with Hollywood censors. Eventually, he started inventing his own swear words and substituting expressions like “we shot the sheep together” for the more common, risque expression.

Red Skelton was one of my favorite comedians. He offered humorous skits, like his commercial for Guzzler’s Gin, during which he progressivekly got drunker. He also developed a host of comical personalities – Willy Lumplump and Clem Kadiddlehopper – which he could quickly adopt, literally with the change of a hat. And he’d conduct the entire hour-long TV show without a single profane word or suggestive story.

Anyway, I fully support our modern comedians and sitcoms and usually find them very humorous. But somewhere along the way we’ve lost something. Something quite wonderful and very funny.

More in Opinion

State Dems may abandon caucus chaos in time for 2020

Washington also is considering becoming more significant by moving its primary to early March.

The four cornerstones of arguing irrationally

Don’t get caught up in the techniques people use to ignore rational arguments.

A taste of Krain history, from its dive-bar days

I first went in the place one winter’s evening when I was 8 or 9 years old.

Supreme Court resets the playing field

The ruling on the Masterpiece Bakery v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case wasn’t a win for the right or a loss for the left; it’s a chance to do things right the second time around.

Supreme Court ruling shows sanity, moderation

The 14th Amendment equal protection clause does not negate the First Amendment religious freedom clause.

Initiative signatures are the new greenbacks

As of Wednesday, June 6, petitions for four statewide initiatives were getting circulated.

Trump supporters see the president doing ‘God’s will on Earth’

Why did Truman recognize Israel so quickly and why do we care about modern Israel, enough to bring the ire of the Muslim world down upon us?

Eyman risking retirement funds on car tab initiative

Will the $500,000 investment be enough to get the initiative on a ballot?

U.S. isn’t the only nation flirting with trade wars

There’s another brewing between Alberta and British Columbia.

I wish I could stay in Enumclaw | Guest Columnist

There is a kindness and decency and desire to be a community in Enumclaw.

We live in frightening times

Our country is being torn apart from limb to limb, coast to coast.

Voting habits tied to feelings of security

The dangers of authoritarianism are a far greater threat to the nation than seeing rising racial equality and religious diversity brought about by immigration.