‘Start over’ is not code for stonewalling health-care reform

President Obama and Democrats in Congress say that starting over on health-care reform is akin to stonewalling.

President Obama and Democrats in Congress say that starting over on health-care reform is akin to stonewalling. They are wrong, just as wrong as those who want to do nothing.

The problem is there is too much testosterone flying around the nation’s capitol and Americans are tired of the antics and political gamesmanship. It’s time to give them all an ice cold shower and send them back to work.

Reforming health care is not about social engineering; it is not about jamming an unpopular and expensive experiment down our throats. It is about building upon what is working and fixing what is not.

But the competing plans in Congress amount to a complicated and untested trillion-dollar gamble. What would their plans mean for America?

The first clue is what is happening in Massachusetts.

That state’s universal health plan is the basis for the Democrats’ health-care reform in Congress, yet average Massachusetts insurance premiums are now the highest in the nation, and the state is now poised to impose cost controls in an effort to stop the financial hemorrhage.

Since it was enacted in 2006, premiums in Massachusetts have climbed at an annual rate of 30 percent in the individual market. Small business costs have increased by 5.8 percent. Per capita, health spending in Massachusetts is now 27 percent higher than the national average.

Translation: It is not the model for America’s health-care system.

Yes, health care is too expensive, but there are safer ways to bring down costs. It all starts by giving consumers a choice and allowing market-based innovations to flourish.

For example, Indiana has implemented consumer-driven health care for state workers using HSAs or Health Saving Accounts. The state pays the premium for the plan and deposits $2,750 per year in an account controlled by the employee. Employees use the money to pay their medical bills and get to keep any unused funds. The intent is that participants will become more cost-conscious and careful about overpayment or overutilization.

To date, Indiana employees have pocketed some $30 million or about $2,000 per employee in unused HSA funds. For the 6 percent of employees who use up their entire account, the state shares additional health costs up to an out-of-pocket maximum of $8,000, after which the employee is completely protected.

More than 70 percent of Indiana’s 30,000 state workers chose the HSA option this year, by far the highest in America’s public sector. However, because government unions have rejected these plans, the average use of HSAs in the public sector nationally is just 2 percent.

We have also seen effective ways to keep down prescription drug costs.

A couple of years ago, when people were up in arms about the costs of prescription drugs, Wal-Mart introduced the $4 prescription drug program. Then two years ago, Safeway matched Wal-Mart.

These ideas — Health Savings Accounts and low-cost prescription drug programs —can be thrown into the mix if the president and Congress would clear their minds, park their egos, forget about their legacies and find ways to help Americans get the health care they deserve at a cost they can afford.

Unfortunately, that may not happen, given the tenor and temperament in the other Washington these days. But the American people have had enough. If Democrats insist on jamming a bill through using what is called “reconciliation,” Katy, bar the door! Voters will make the Massachusetts election look like a church picnic.

Don Brunell is the president of the Association of Washington Business.

More in Opinion

Supreme Court resets the playing field

The ruling on the Masterpiece Bakery v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case wasn’t a win for the right or a loss for the left; it’s a chance to do things right the second time around.

Supreme Court ruling shows sanity, moderation

The 14th Amendment equal protection clause does not negate the First Amendment religious freedom clause.

Initiative signatures are the new greenbacks

As of Wednesday, June 6, petitions for four statewide initiatives were getting circulated.

Public record battle brings in a mediator

A taskforce is also being put together, but it’s not clear who will be on it.

One almond latte, if you please | Wally’s World

There was a time in the distant past when a friend and… Continue reading

Eyman risking retirement funds on car tab initiative

Will the $500,000 investment be enough to get the initiative on a ballot?

U.S. isn’t the only nation flirting with trade wars

There’s another brewing between Alberta and British Columbia.

I wish I could stay in Enumclaw | Guest Columnist

There is a kindness and decency and desire to be a community in Enumclaw.

We live in frightening times

Our country is being torn apart from limb to limb, coast to coast.

Voting habits tied to feelings of security

The dangers of authoritarianism are a far greater threat to the nation than seeing rising racial equality and religious diversity brought about by immigration.

Gun rights advocates won the battle, but may lose the war

NRA leaders will need to decide if it’s worth putting resources into a fight in a Left Coast state versus investing in efforts to keep Republicans in control of Congress to prevent ideas like this initiative from becoming federal law.

Trump not accomplishing as much as supporters think

This is in response to Craig Chilton’s letter claiming Trump’s presidency is not a mistake because of all of his “accomplishments,” 81 signed pieces of legislation.