We can’t open the door for discrimination | Letter to the Editor

Although I have agreed with Mr. Elfers on several topics, I have to take issue with his stance on discrimination against gays based on religious liberty ("Same Sex Marriage Act before Supreme Court" published July 27).

  • Friday, August 5, 2016 2:03pm
  • Opinion

Although I have agreed with Mr. Elfers on several topics, I have to take issue with his stance on discrimination against gays based on religious liberty (“Same Sex Marriage Act before Supreme Court” published July 27).

What Mr. Elfers and others with his opinion fail to see is the bigger picture. He sees a flower shop seller who doesn’t want to support gay marriage by selling flowers for a wedding based on her religious liberty. He says ‘there are other flower shops available’. Let’s look at the bigger picture. Once that door is open, is it then OK for a landlord not to rent to a gay couple based on his religious liberty?

Let’s make the picture bigger. Is it then also OK for a religious hospital, say, St. Elizabeth for instance, to refuse medical services to a gay person based on their religious liberty? Once you open that door and make it OK, where does it stop? Perhaps it should also then be OK for that same flower shop owner to not sell to a Christian couple because, according to her religion, Christians are infidels? Or perhaps that landlord doesn’t want to rent to that couple because they are atheists? Or perhaps that hospital no longer wants to provide medical assistance to somebody because they are Jewish? Where does it stop?

Once you open that door and say that it is alright for that flower lady to discriminate against somebody, anybody, based on her religious opinion, then disregarding the law based on your own religious belief makes discrimination legal, and that discrimination will no longer have to stop at your own front door. Next time it won’t be a legally married gay couple that is discriminated against. Next time it may be you.

Brenda Perron-Horner

Enumclaw

More in Opinion

State Dems may abandon caucus chaos in time for 2020

Washington also is considering becoming more significant by moving its primary to early March.

The four cornerstones of arguing irrationally

Don’t get caught up in the techniques people use to ignore rational arguments.

A taste of Krain history, from its dive-bar days

I first went in the place one winter’s evening when I was 8 or 9 years old.

Supreme Court resets the playing field

The ruling on the Masterpiece Bakery v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case wasn’t a win for the right or a loss for the left; it’s a chance to do things right the second time around.

Supreme Court ruling shows sanity, moderation

The 14th Amendment equal protection clause does not negate the First Amendment religious freedom clause.

Initiative signatures are the new greenbacks

As of Wednesday, June 6, petitions for four statewide initiatives were getting circulated.

Trump supporters see the president doing ‘God’s will on Earth’

Why did Truman recognize Israel so quickly and why do we care about modern Israel, enough to bring the ire of the Muslim world down upon us?

Eyman risking retirement funds on car tab initiative

Will the $500,000 investment be enough to get the initiative on a ballot?

U.S. isn’t the only nation flirting with trade wars

There’s another brewing between Alberta and British Columbia.

I wish I could stay in Enumclaw | Guest Columnist

There is a kindness and decency and desire to be a community in Enumclaw.

We live in frightening times

Our country is being torn apart from limb to limb, coast to coast.

Voting habits tied to feelings of security

The dangers of authoritarianism are a far greater threat to the nation than seeing rising racial equality and religious diversity brought about by immigration.