Honestly, there’s no problem defining ‘morality’

  • Wednesday, July 10, 2019 10:42am
  • Opinion

A friend challenged me about not defining morality and compassion in a recent column. I wrote about the lack of morality of the modern Republican Party. I also noted that today’s Democratic Party has compassion for some groups, but not morality or concern for all groups, especially conservatives.

The definition of morality is “virtuous conduct” or “the quality of being in accord with the standards of right or good conduct.” Compassion is defined as, “Deep awareness of the suffering of another accompanied by the wish to relieve it. synonym: pity” (Wordnik).

We live in what has been called the postmodern world. Today, morality is what you as an individual decide is right or wrong. There is no universal truth.

Or is there?

Our western culture is based upon the premise of what Isaac Newton called natural law: gravity, motion and the nature of light. The English philosopher John Locke took those natural laws and converted them into natural rights: that all men are created equal and whose rights include life, liberty and property. Thomas Jefferson, taking and adapting Locke’s ideas, clearly defined those natural rights in the Declaration of Independence. But, instead of the right to property, we are guaranteed the right to pursue happiness. These standards of morality formed the foundation for our nation’s laws and the structure of our government found in the U.S. Constitution.

The problem we have today is that when the Constitution was created in the summer of 1787 in that hot, stuffy room in Carpenters’ Hall in Philadelphia, there was no one writing a glossary of terms for all the words used in that document. That was probably a good thing in the short run. Had there been a definition of terms, there might not have been a Constitution. People have a tendency to put their own meanings to words. When words are not defined, there is room for different interpretations. The ambiguity of the meaning of words allowed the Constitution to be passed by the 39 delegates and then ratified by the people of the 13 states.

In the long term, because the Constitution has a lot of vagueness, we need nine justices to interpret what the words mean 232 years later. For those of us who have followed the recent decisions of the Supreme Court, there are strong differences of opinion over what those words actually mean. Those differences divided the decisions over the drawing of congressional districts; the Court refused to judge those matters, or whether race should play a part in how districts are formed – race cannot be used to create districts. Those justices decide what is moral what is not in regard to laws.

Compassion can and has been interpreted in different ways. Is it compassion for individuals, groups or corporations? That depends on who decides, whether conservative or progressive justices.

Defining what morality and compassion are is not so easy or simple. The answers are complex and depend on the context of the case. If I tell you someone murdered someone else, your first response might be that that person should be punished. But if I tell you that person murdered someone to protect a child from being murdered by someone else, the answer changes. That’s the nature of law. It depends.

While we like to believe our morality differs from another’s in our postmodern world, the reality is that there are natural laws and natural rights that govern human behavior. In actuality, we all really know what is moral and compassionate if we’re honest. It’s only when we’re seeking to gain power and advantage for ourselves that our definitions of right and wrong change.

My friend strongly advocated I define terms. I agree, but not when it comes to the words, morality and compassion. Those definitions are self-evident.

More in Opinion

Transparency in government helps lobbyists

Even the most basic tenets of our government can be turned to aid those with deep pockets.

New voting system parks primary election concerns

Is VoteWA ready for its debut, live and untested?

Elfers continues to condescend

Every week, it’s the same message — “I hate Trump.”

2020 Census and the importance of being counted

Census affects everything from government representation to federal funding.

Elk on the Trail update

A big thank you to the entire community for your support.

A simple rule for a better life: just tell the truth

Don’t make life more difficult than it already is.

Thank you for your support

Thanks to all who supported us in these tough times.

There are many alternatives to abortion

Most women who get an abortion say they can’t afford a child, but adoption is always an option.

To our detriment, nation lacks positive role models

No compassion, no morals: who do we have left to look up to?

Conspicuous Environmentalist, a poem

Refuse, Reuse, and Recycle please.

No more potholes at Community Center

Now our seniors and their walkers glide across the parking lot with ease.

Our national flag is being disrespected

Don’t misuse our flag to support other organizations or causes.