Letters to the Editor

A dubious landmark in Washington state history culminated in Linda Fleming becoming the first victim of the death with dignity assisted suicide law. Several others await.

A dubious landmark in Washington state history culminated in Linda Fleming becoming the first victim of the death with dignity assisted suicide law. Several others await.

Not being an apologist for the death penalty, it seems ironic that three murderers sitting on Washington’s death row petitioned the court to overturn the mandate of death by lethal injection on the grounds it is “cruel and unusual punishment.” Washington’s assisted suicide measure permits the terminally ill to “die with dignity,” a questionable process meant to end the suffering of individuals. Following the supporters of Initiative 1000’s logic, the state should administer the identical lethal cocktail to aforementioned murderers, thereby granting them the same dignified exit that the new law gave to Linda Fleming. This method would certainly give these convicted killers more respect then they granted their victims and it cannot be cruel since the drugs used are permitted by the Washington’s compassionate assisted suicide law.

George Terhaar

Enumclaw

President Obama has announced his first Supreme Court nominee to the U.S. Senate. It is a female of Puerto Rican decent by the name of Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

It is no surprise that President Obama nominated a left-wing extremist. No surprise, I was expecting that. But what is really telling is the double standard that exists in this country. It is a double standard I have preached about for years. With the help of the so-called mainstream media, the left is held to a different standard than the right.

Under Sonia Sotomayor, justice is not blind. She sees color, gender and economic status in her rulings. Just ask white firefighters in Connecticut that she ruled against. The ruling she made in this affirmative action case is most likely going to be overturned by the court she has been nominated. The rulings that she has authored have been overruled by the Supreme Court 60 percent of the time. She has been admonished by judges of her inability to apply Constitutonal law to her decisions. It sounds like she is incompetent. If she was a conservative, she would not have been on the “short list” of potential nominees.

Sonia Sotomayor stated in a speech in 2002 to the UC-Berkeley School of Law that because she is a female Latina and the richness of her life, she would more likely come up with better decisions than a white male that has not lived her life. So, President Obama has nominated a racist for the Supreme Court, how nice. Can you imagine what would have happened if current Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, a George Bush nominee, had stated that because he is a white male, he would be more likely to come up with better decisions than a Latina female, or black female, or Asian homosexual because they have not lived his life? He would not be on the Supreme Court and rightfully so. But not in this country. Oh no, because she is a liberal, the Democrats and “mainstream media” are celebrating her despite her racist, sexist attitudes. All part of the “liberalism is a mental disorder” belief that I have been preaching about.

She has also made statements that she believes policy is made in the appeals court. In other words, she is a judicial activist who wants to create law in her role as a judge, to reflect her world view.

Make no mistake, the Supreme Court is an appeals court and she will continue this philosophy. Justice is not blind to Sonia Sotomayor, she sees color, gender, ethnicity, race and economic status in her decisions. But any conservative with her same racists and sexist traits would not be on the Supreme Court, and rightfully so.

I believe that Sonia Sotomayor is a reflection of President Obama’s views about race. But he will get away with it because there are enough Democrats that will appoint her as a Supreme Court judge and the “mainstream media” will not run the risk of derailing this nomination by speaking the truth about her. Don’t believe President Obama when he sings the praises of Sonia Sotomayor.

She is a terrible nominee for the highest court in the land. Do some research and look at her statements in speeches and her rulings and you have to conclude that Sonia Sotomayor is a racist and a sexist.

J. Buss

Enumclaw

More in Opinion

The times, they are a-changin’

My friends, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is advancing in such leaps and bounds it boggles my imagination.

Thank you Murray for increasing Alzheimer’s research funding

As someone who helped care for a mother with Alzheimer’s and who now misses her every day, I understand firsthand the impact this disease has on families across America.

Tribalism led to the loss of Vietnam, Iraq wars

Knowing and understanding tribalism can offer a solution to the divisions at home and abroad.

The Fennel Creek Trail will benefit nearby communities

Contrary to the beliefs of some, the increased number of people using trails discourages criminal activities by increasing the number of eyes watching what is going on.

The sweetest revenge? Sometimes it’s just being nice

Being kind to others, especially those who have harmed or hurt us, comes as a result of seeing others as our equals.

Mental health competency delays cost state millions

Soon, some of those languishing lengthy periods behind bars might need to be released and charges against them dismissed.

State Dems may abandon caucus chaos in 2020

Last week the state Democratic Party signaled a greater ope nness to allocate delegates ba sed on the results of the prim ary rather than caucuses, whic h it’s never done before.

The four cornerstones of arguing irrationally

Don’t get caught up in the techniques people use to ignore rational arguments.

State Dems may abandon caucus chaos in time for 2020

Washington also is considering becoming more significant by moving its primary to early March.

A taste of Krain history, from its dive-bar days

I first went in the place one winter’s evening when I was 8 or 9 years old.

Supreme Court resets the playing field

The ruling on the Masterpiece Bakery v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case wasn’t a win for the right or a loss for the left; it’s a chance to do things right the second time around.

Supreme Court ruling shows sanity, moderation

The 14th Amendment equal protection clause does not negate the First Amendment religious freedom clause.