We can’t claim to respect human life when we allow abortion

Eliminating the death penalty was just the first step in the right direction.

Justice demands all are treated equally under the law. This pertains not only to the death penalty which the High Court ruled has been biased against African-Americans in our state, but for the past 45 years there is absolutely no justice, no equality under the law for the millions of the unborn, humans developing in their mother’s wombs (who didn’t begin life here and in the same way?), who have been denied their most basic right-the right to life.

When the defendant’s attorney, Neil Fox, claims that “by striking down the 1981 death penalty statute, Washington now joins the overwhelming majority of the world’s democracies in its respect for human life,” this ruling is merely a declaration that the state will no longer commit lawful murder against convicted criminals. The state, as well as the overwhelming majority of the world’s democracies whose laws allow abortion, is far from having respect for human life for the life of a child in a mother’s womb is never safe from execution without representation or due process, while even the child’s father has no rights regarding the life of his child. Both father and child are denied their human rights.

While most consider it to be more humane to eliminate the death penalty, it would not exist in the first place if those committing crimes that warranted the death penalty under the statute were not born: thus, the right to human life is the first condition in determining rights; i.e., no rights would exist if one is not alive.

One could say that this is a step in the right direction respecting human life; yet when human life can be arbitrarily snuffed out (as the Washington state Supreme Court ruled the death penalty was “imposed in an arbitrary and racially biased manner”) in its most vulnerable state of being, we cannot truthfully claim to respect human life but merely “respect” human life categorized. Isn’t categorizing human life the worst kind of example of an arbitrary and biased form of law?

Elaine Biggerstaff

Bonney Lake


Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing editor@courierherald.com.

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.courierherald.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 500 words or less.

More in Letters to the Editor

Vote for Rep. Kim Schrier

Her leadership is vital during this pandemic.

148,000 deaths isn’t a silver lining

And what was that about a Civil War?

Be a responsible American and wear a mask

It’s about protecting others, not yourself.

The Enumclaw Food Bank is a valuable community resource, too

We may not be as fancy as POM, but we provide vital assistance to Plateau residents.

Elfers picks politics over human suffering

There is no ‘silver lining’ to the pandemic.

EPD’s lack of mask enforcement puts community in danger

Officers need to do more than “education”.

Fugate Ford saved graduation

The social distancing parade was what our students needed to celebrate.

Big business should close, small businesses should stay open

They have the resources to weather the storm. I don’t.

Respectfully returning my stimulus check

The national debt is a national crisis.

Thank you, neighbors!

Mowing the lawn is difficult at my age.

While we fight against COVID-19, let’s also target TB

Might as well take out two birds with one stone.

We’ve lost our ability to be nuanced about the past

Americans understand the Founding Fathers and other historical figures weren’t saints.