Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Christian contradictions
Reader Nancy Butler asks if Christians can really support the president and his policies.
Latest Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Two hundred and fifty years of dreaming
Reader Stanley McKie argues the current administration’s xenophobia holds America back.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: You can’t convince me faith or Republicans serve our country
Reader Larry Benson refutes two recent letters about Christianity.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Callais changes the playing field for all
Reader Tom Marsland argues that SCOTUS rewrote Voting Rights Act rules to solve one issue.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Callais and backward progressive logic
Reader Kristopher Galvin argues against separate voting districts based solely on skin color.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Recent letter disparages Black voters
Reader George Terhaar says Black voters think for themselves and are not a Democrat monolith.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Repent before the rapture
Reader Eileen Hicks continues to delve into stories from the Bible.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Letter writer misunderstands Christianity
Reader Kristopher Galvin says a recent letter writer mischaracterized Christians.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Bread, circuses, and the president
Reader Stanley McKie argues President Trumps focus on sports events degrades America.
Letters to the Editor
Prayer does not equal support
Reader Mark Akers clarifies his position of praying for those in authority.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: The degradation of the Supreme Court
Reader Larry Benson argues SCOTUS has become a tool of the political right.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Governing via spectacle
Reader Stanley McKie argues the president is selling his brand, not serving the people.
Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Read Louisiana v Callais opinion for yourself
Reader Kristopher Galvin says the phrase “Jim Crow 2.0” is designed to divide.